Friday, April 18, 2014

Certain places you can smoke a cigarette



SMOKERS should prepare for the day when they are virtually confined to lighting up in their own backyards. They will not be able to smoke on footpaths, and feeding their habits in public will be restricted to a few designated smoking zones.
Dr Penman said it was becoming increasingly unacceptable that people could be subjected to drifts of smoke from fellow pedestrians when they walked down the street.
"It should get to the stage where there are only certain places you can smoke a cigarette, that is, smoking-permitted parks or small squares," he said. "We are recommending to the government that outdoor smoking needs to move . . . to the assumption that smoking is prohibited from all outdoor areas unless otherwise stated."
NSW legislation already bans smoking from enclosed public areas, workplaces, hospitals and cars carrying passengers under 16. In what anti-smoking campaigners describe as a loophole, lighting up is still allowed in semi-enclosed rooms in pubs and clubs.
Heart Foundation NSW chief executive Tony Thirlwell said 74 of the 152 councils in NSW had introduced smoke-free outdoor areas policies, with 14 of those policies covering alfresco dining areas.
Anne Jones, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health, known as ASH Australia, said councils had taken responsibility where the NSW government "was doing nothing".
But the smoking battleground has moved from indoors to outdoors, with councils leading the charge. Smoking is banned in many children's playgrounds, sports fields, public pools, beaches, outdoor dining areas and bus shelters.
The latest councils to enact smoke-free policies are City of Sydney, Leichhardt and Waverley. Warringah is expanding its policy to cover bus shelters and the grounds of Brookvale Oval. Newcastle has banned smoking at bus shelters. Mr Thirlwell said the next step should be a state law banning smoking in all outdoor crowded areas, including concerts.
Queensland and Victoria had been more active. "The focus up to now has been protecting people indoors," she said. "Now, it's crowded outdoor areas."
Ms Jones praised tough measures announced last week by the Rudd government to raise the prices of cigarettes by about $2 and mandate plain packaging by 2012. In another federal assault on the tobacco industry, displays of its products in shops will stop by July 1.
Smoking kills 15,000 people a year in Australia. The government's aim is to reduce the smoking rate from 16 per cent to 10 per cent within the decade.

People who give up smoking are prone to developing diabetes



“People who give up smoking are prone to developing diabetes because they gain weight,” TheTimes reported. It said a study has found that quitters are twice as likely as smokers, and 70% more likely than non-smokers, to have type 2 diabetes.
This study found that smokers and recent quitters had a greater risk of diabetes compared to those who had never smoked, but that three years after quitting this risk had reduced. The suggestion that this is because quitters are more likely to gain weight is logical, but it cannot be proven by this cohort study.
The results of this study do not mean that smoking is protective to health. Smokers and former smokers were at greater risk of diabetes than those who had never smoked, and the benefits of giving up far outweigh any temporary increase in risk. Instead, these findings emphasise the importance of an active lifestyle and a healthy balanced diet, and demonstrate the importance of providing quitters with education and support to achieve this.

Where did the story come from?

This research was carried out by Hsin-Chieh Yeh and colleagues from Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil and the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. The study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Disease. It was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

What kind of research was this?

This cohort study enrolled a large group of middle-aged people who were free of diabetes, and followed them up over nine years to assess whether quitting smoking affected the risk of diabetes.
Where a randomised controlled trial (RCT) would be unethical, a cohort study is the best alternative for examining whether a particular exposure, in this case quitting smoking, increases the risk of a certain disease developing over time. The research needs to ensure that people are free from the disease at the beginning of the study, and take into account other confounding factors that could influence any observed associations.

What did the research involve?

The data for this study were obtained from a previous study on atherosclerosis called the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, which recruited middle-aged people from several sites in the US. The ARIC recruits visited a clinic between 1987 and 1989, and then had three follow-up visits scheduled at about three-year intervals from 1990 to 1998. From this point onwards until 2004, they were only contacted by phone. Smoking status and number of cigarettes smoked was assessed at every follow-up. The development of diabetes up to the last clinic visit in 1998 was determined by fasting blood glucose levels, and from 1998 up to 2004 by self-report of a doctor’s diagnosis of diabetes or use of diabetes medications.
For this particular study, the 17-year follow-up information from the ARIC study was used for the 9,398 middle-aged adults who were free from diabetes when ARIC began and in the first three years of follow-up, and who had information on smoking status at each point during follow-up. For all participants, physical examination, various other medical data and information on other lifestyle factors were collected during follow-up, and various analyses carried out.
People were grouped according to how much they smoked at the beginning of the study. This was calculated as pack-years smoked (average number of cigarettes per day multiplied by the years of smoking divided by 20). People who were lifelong non-smokers formed the control group. For each category the incidence of diabetes during follow-up was calculated.
To assess the effect of quitting smoking on diabetes risk, the researchers looked at the effect of a change in smoking status from the start of the study to the first three-year follow-up, and risk of diabetes at the three and nine-year follow-ups. They also looked at the change in smoking status and the effects on various metabolic variables, such as weight, waist and hip circumference, blood pressure and cholesterol. A number of other statistical analyses were then carried out, including an assessment of how various measures at the beginning of the study could affect weight-gain risk, how various other factors affected diabetes risk, and analyses using only self-reported data.
That multiple statistical tests were carried out is a slight drawback to the study. There are also likely to have been some unavoidable inaccuracies in self-reported measures such as duration of smoking, number of cigarettes smoked and time since quitting.

What were the basic results?

The study found that smoking increased the risk of diabetes, and that there was a dose-response relationship, meaning that the more packs smoked the greater the diabetes risk. Quitting smoking was also associated with increased risk compared to never smoking. New quitters at three-year follow up (380 of them) were 1.73 times more likely than those who had never smoked to develop diabetes. However, when the analysis was adjusted for weight change, white blood cell count at the beginning of the study and all other known risk factors for diabetes (including gender, BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, triglyceride level, cholesterol, blood pressure), the incidence was 1.24 times greater in quitters than those who had never smoked, but this was no longer significant.
The highest risk of diabetes for quitters occurred in the first three years, but gradually reduced to zero at 12 years. Former smokers who had smoked more than three years ago did not have a significantly increased risk of diabetes.

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers concluded that cigarette smoking increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, but that quitting smoking also increases the risk in the short term. They advise that smokers who have other risk factors for diabetes receive smoking cessation care coupled with strategies for diabetes prevention and early detection.

Conclusion

Smoking is associated with an increased risk of diabetes, and the current study confirms this. However, the effect of quitting smoking on diabetes risk has been unclear until now. This study found that quitting is associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes in the short term, but that this risk decreases over time. When the researchers adjusted their analyses for weight change since quitting this affected the risk.
This was a well conducted study that carried out extensive follow-up on a large number of participants. However, there are some points to consider:
·         As the authors acknowledge, though they adjusted for various established diabetes risk factors, there is still the possibility of residual confounding from unmeasured factors.
·         Several of the self-reported measures, most notably smoking status, frequency of smoking and time since quitting, are likely to involve some degree of inaccuracy.
·         Multiple statistical tests were carried out, and this is a slight drawback to this research, as it increases the risk that the findings are due to chance only. However, this likelihood is reduced by the fact that the study specified its research hypothesis prior to the start of the study.
·         The theory is that, while quitting smoking may reduce inflammation in the body and so reduce diabetes risk, the weight gain that quitters often experience could adversely influence this risk. Although this pattern may be suggested by these results, no firm conclusions can be made. Adjusting for weight change did reduce the strength of the association between quitting and diabetes risk but the risk remained significant indicating that there are other factors involved. In addition, the reasons for the person’s weight gain have not been examined.
The recommendation of the researchers seems sensible. Smokers who quit should receive advice about avoiding weight gain, diabetes prevention and how to spot the early signs of the disease.

Tobacco sales and related diseases from smoking



Massachusetts is poised to become the first state in the nation to force retailers to prominently display graphic warnings about the perils of smoking right where cigarettes are sold — at tobacco sales racks and next to cash registers.
Retailers who refuse to display the signs within 2 feet of tobacco displays and cash registers could face fines of $100 to $300.
A retail industry group reacted yesterday with dismay, arguing that cramped corner stores are already burdened by too many regulatory dictums.
Images of ominously darkened lungs, damaged brains, and diseased teeth could start appearing before the end of the year in more than 9,000 convenience stores, pharmacies, and gas stations, if a proposal by the state Department of Public Health is approved as expected. Other posters would direct smokers to where they can get help to stamp out their habit. For example on the Richmond cigarette pack will be staying a poster of a tobacco related disease or maybe an advice to help quit the habit.
Graphic images portraying the damage wrought by smoking have been a hallmark of antismoking campaigns in Europe for years. But, in the United States, admonitions on cigarette packs and at stores have tended to rely on words rather than pictures.
The initiative needs the approval of the state Public Health Council — an appointed panel of doctors, disease trackers, and consumer activists — but board members yesterday expressed unequivocal support. Since the 1990s, Massachusetts has been at the vanguard of US efforts to reduce tobacco use, the leading cause of preventable deaths in the United States.
 “If somebody is trying to quit smoking and they go back to the store and they’re tempted — oh, just one pack — we hope this will help them make a different choice,’’ said Lois Keithly, director of the Massachusetts Tobacco Cessation and Prevention Program.
The signs are modeled on a nothing-left-to-the-imagination campaign in New York City, where signs showing the health effects of smoking began sprouting in 11,500 shops last December. Massachusetts health authorities provided copies of the New York City posters as an illustration of what their campaign will look like.
The campaign is being underwritten by $316,000 in federal stimulus money from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which will allow the state to provide the materials to retailers without charge. “And they’re just very ineffective at this point,’’ said Eileen Sullivan, policy director for the state’s tobacco control program.
The Retailers Association of Massachusetts has not decided how gamely it will fight the proposal, but the organization’s president, Jon Hurst, left little doubt that most shopkeepers will respond coolly to another mandate. That may prove especially true at convenience stores, where tobacco sales constitute a significant share of business.